Anchorage Digital is the federally chartered digital-asset bank operated by Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A., the only OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) federally chartered digital-asset institution in the United States. The bank holds a US national trust charter granted in January 2021 and operates institutional cryptoasset custody, settlement, on-chain governance services, and an expanding tokenised-asset custody franchise from offices in San Francisco, New York, Singapore, and Lisbon. For an institutional tokenisation operator, Anchorage is the most-cited US example of regulated digital-asset custody under a federal banking charter rather than a state-by-state money-transmitter map (Zerohash) or a non-bank institutional custody perimeter (Fireblocks, BitGo), and the natural counterparty for asset managers and stablecoin issuers wanting qualified-custody coverage of tokenised securities and digital-asset reserves under a federally supervised wrapper.
What it is
Anchorage Digital was founded in 2017 and operates through Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A., the federally chartered subsidiary, plus international affiliates that hold local licences for non-US activity. The OCC granted the federal trust charter in January 2021, conditional on continued compliance with the OCC's prudential supervision regime, and the bank has operated under that charter since. The legal status as a federally chartered national bank materially differentiates Anchorage from the state-licensed digital-asset custodians (Coinbase Custody Trust under New York limited-purpose trust, Bitgo Trust under South Dakota state trust, Gemini Trust under New York limited-purpose trust) and from the non-bank infrastructure custodians (Fireblocks, Zerohash) that operate under different combinations of MTL (money-transmitter licence) and trust-company structures.
The asset coverage spans major cryptocurrencies, USD stablecoins, an expanding set of tokenised securities and tokenised-fund interests, and on-chain governance positions for institutional clients participating in DeFi protocol governance. Anchorage operates qualified-custody under the SEC's investment-adviser custody rule for clients that need that wrapper, and the federal trust charter gives the institution direct supervisory recognition that adjacent state-trust custodians cannot match in a regulated counterparty conversation.
Operating model
Anchorage's operating model is the federal-bank-grade custody pattern applied to digital and tokenised assets. Institutional clients onboard to Anchorage, complete the bank's KYC and AML perimeter, and hold their cryptoasset and tokenised-asset balances on Anchorage's books. Asset segregation is at the per-client level, with the underlying private-key infrastructure handled by Anchorage's institutional-grade custody stack (HSM-based key management, multi-party computation, governance controls). Settlement happens through Anchorage's omnibus or segregated balances on-chain; the client sees the balance through Anchorage's institutional interface or through API integrations with the client's own portfolio-management systems.
The named integrations on the tokenisation side include Anchorage as one of the supported qualified custodians for Securitize-issued tokenised products, named participation as a custodian for stablecoin-issuer reserve programmes (the specific issuer relationships are subject to standard custody-confidentiality), and the broader institutional-tokenisation ecosystem participation through industry working groups. The on-chain governance services line gives institutional clients participation in DeFi protocol governance (token-based voting, delegation) under a regulated custody wrapper rather than requiring direct on-chain interaction from the client's own wallet.
The settlement-network participation is a structurally important element. Anchorage has been visible in the Canton Network ecosystem and in adjacent permissioned-bank-grade settlement infrastructure conversations, with named participation tracked through industry coverage. The structural read is that as tokenised-asset settlement moves from public-chain venues into permissioned bank-grade ledgers, the federally chartered custody franchise positions Anchorage to extend the same regulated-custody pattern across both perimeters.
The APAC presence is anchored on the Singapore office and adjacent regional client-facing activity. Anchorage has been a named institutional digital-asset infrastructure participant in Singapore-based tokenisation conversations, with specific live mandate coverage not consistently disclosed in current public material.
Why it matters
Three reasons. First, the federal-charter moat. Anchorage is the only OCC federally chartered digital-asset bank in the US. Standing up a federal trust charter is a multi-year, multi-million-dollar regulatory and operational undertaking, and Anchorage has been the only entity to clear the OCC's threshold to date. The structural implication is that any US regulatory or supervisory question about digital-asset custody under a federal banking wrapper has Anchorage as the worked example, which gives the firm an outsized voice in the regulatory conversation alongside its operational footprint.
Second, the qualified-custody positioning. The SEC's investment-adviser custody rule and the broader institutional asset-allocator preference for federally supervised custody counterparties make Anchorage a natural choice for asset managers and family offices wanting digital-asset and tokenised-asset exposure under a regulated custody wrapper. The competitive map for that mandate is partly Coinbase Custody Trust (state-trust, New York), partly BitGo Trust (state-trust, South Dakota), partly the bank-internal digital-asset desks (BNY Digital Asset Custody, State Street Digital), and partly the bank-incubated custody franchises (Zodia Custody from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures). Anchorage's federal charter positions it differently from each of these counterparties.
Third, the tokenisation-custody growth angle. As tokenised securities, tokenised-fund interests, and stablecoin-issuer reserve mandates grow, the share of Anchorage's franchise in tokenised-asset custody (as distinct from cryptoasset custody) is structurally rising. The firm's positioning into the Securitize-platform whitelist set, the named stablecoin-issuer reserve mandates, and the broader institutional-tokenisation infrastructure participation tracks that growth.
Recent moves
- 2024-2025. Continued expansion of tokenised-asset custody coverage, including named integrations into Securitize-issued product custody and adjacent tokenisation infrastructure participation.
- 2024-2025. Continued participation in stablecoin-issuer reserve custody arrangements, with the specific issuer relationships subject to standard custody-confidentiality.
-
- Anchorage's positioning across the broader US digital-asset regulatory conversation continued to track the US GENIUS Act and US CLARITY Act legislative cycle, with the federally chartered status positioning the firm as a structurally important counterparty for any US-perimeter tokenisation programme.
- January 2021. Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A. granted a US national trust charter by the OCC, becoming the first federally chartered digital-asset bank in the United States.
- The Singapore office and adjacent APAC institutional client-facing activity continued through 2024-2026; specific named regional mandate coverage is not consistently disclosed.
Open questions
- Period-specific AUC (assets under custody) figures across digital-asset and tokenised-asset balances. Anchorage has not historically published comparable AUC disclosures against state-licensed custody peers.
- The named institutional client base on the tokenised-asset custody side beyond the Securitize-platform integration. Subject to standard custody-confidentiality.
- Specific stablecoin-issuer reserve relationships and the share of reserves held under Anchorage custody. Subject to issuer attestation rather than custodian disclosure.
- APAC mandate growth from the Singapore office, particularly named tokenisation-platform partnerships under the MAS SCS framework perimeter.
- Anchorage's positioning under the US GENIUS Act for stablecoin-issuer reserve custody. The federal trust charter is structurally aligned with the GENIUS Act's reserve-custody requirements; the operational scope for that role is still being formed.
- Agentic commerce posture. Federally chartered custody of digital and tokenised assets under a regulated wrapper is structurally compatible with AI-agent-controlled wallet arrangements; Anchorage has not publicly addressed whether such wallets would be permitted client configurations.